|
|
Basketball |
Welcome back to the Basketball Blog! Today we test the limits of this blog’s bandwidth…
Sure the Irish looked like an NIT quarter-finalist Wednesday night vs.
Accentuate the Positive:
Then Again:
Scoring droughts such as these were par for the course last year as well (so common an occurrence it was one of my five listed weaknesses of this team in the pre-season). And I think I know three reasons why:
1.) Let’s get the obvious out of the way: No one on the team can consistently break down his defender one-on-one and score.
2.) The free-flowing style the Irish embrace for the first 30-34 minutes is completely abandoned when the game turns into a possession-for-possession battle. I understand that its human nature to milk the clock in close games; and the Irish are technically just looking for the best shot when they slow it down. But that’s not their style for the 80% of the game. How can they expect this approach to work for the crucial 20% near the end?
3.) Harangody’s a tired warrior. Beaten down from carrying a squad that offered little aid for more than half of the conference games this season. More on this in its own section below.
Now, back to Rutgers…
Yes, freshman Mike Rosario can score on most players at this level (or maybe any level as he progresses). And their big men are bothersome defensively with their combination of strength (Echenique) and length (N’Diaye). But 1-14 is 1-14.
Defensive Improvement, Defensive Issues
“About as good of a look as you’re going to get when the other team needs to shoot a 3.”
That’s an end-game quote from game commentator Mike Kelley (who knows a thing or two about real defense). With
But that’s not the point. This team has recently agreed to play defense in spurts (rather than not at all). But they’ve shown the mental toughness to play that way for 40 minutes just once this season (
Individually, Ryan Ayers had the best four-minute stretch of any Irish player I’ve seen this season (including the block of the year at the
And
For the 2009 Irish, defense is still seen as an annoying means to an end rather than one-half of the game.
Lineup Quandaries
For the first time this season, I think I see the coaching staff’s issue with the incorporation of their three-man bench. Mind you, I didn’t notice this at the game, because I was amazed that Luke Zeller could play a nearly perfect half (offensively) and not take off his warm-up after intermission. And I was shocked that a dead-legged Harangody didn’t cede more playing time in the middle of the 2nd half to Tyrone Nash.
Zeller/Nash combined numbers vs. Rutgers:
19 minutes, 14 points, 3 offensive rebounds, 5-5 from the field, 3-6 from the line, one 3-point basket (Zeller), two “And 1s” (Nash), two assists (both Zeller to Nash). Total second half minutes: TWO. In those two minutes, Nash grabbed an offensive rebound, put it back strong for a bucket, and was slammed to the floor (fouled).
Those aren’t “stolen minutes,” (common coach-speak for: our bench stinks). On the contrary, if you remove Harangody from the equation, those minutes might be better than any two starter contributions you’ve seen from the Irish this season.
For the final time (pardon my broken record): Tyrone Nash needs to play more, at least until crunch time when his foul shooting (pardon the pun) becomes a liability.
But believe it or not, I finally see Coach Brey’s point of view: Who do you take out?
Two of Ayers/Jackson/Peoples have to be on the floor or Notre Dame wouldn’t stop a 7th grader from getting into the lane.
The “Providence Lineup” of Zeller/Ayers/K-Mac/Peoples/Nash again looked strong in limited minutes vs.
Zeller can’t/won’t/doesn’t close out on shooters, even in a zone. Zach Hillesland poses zero offensive threat as teams (even
Kyle McAlarney, while in no way deserving of 39-40 minutes, certainly needs to be on the court as much as possible, if for no other reason than to spread the floor. He defines the basketball term “threat”: If K-Mac misses 10 straight you still need to guard him closely.
So whose minutes should be cut?
Lineup continuity is a major issue: Nash is a better rebounder with Harangody next to him and a better player with Hillesland feeding him passes as a cutter in the lane. Zeller is a better player with a cutting, active Nash as well. Try coming up with a quality lineup that involves those four at the same time.
Peoples is the perfect compliment to a lineup that has scorers, but three of the team’s four scorers are perimeter players. That’s four perimeter players and Harangody. Good luck battling on the boards with Ayers as your second tallest player.
These issues should have been worked out in December vs.
Notre Dame entered the season confident that their bench would fill-in as niche players to augment an experienced starting five. What they failed to realize was that more than half of their starting five were in fact “niche players” as well.
Every team needs role players, just not six of them.
The Weight of the World
I first noticed this at
And regrettably, he’s often halfway down the court after every miss. In his 1-9 and 2-12 start vs. the Scarlet Knights, only three times was he moving towards the basket on a shot. He’s started to rely on the fade away rather than just incorporate it, and if he’s more than 7-feet from the hoop after a shot he rarely crashes the boards. To make matters worse, only Tyrone Nash and Jonathan Peoples have the foresight to attack the offensive glass when Harangody releases a shot (while everybody else stands where they’ve spotted up).
With 7:30 remaining vs.
“Why is he fading away when that guy has four fouls?”
I wish Luke was asked that question on the bench at the next dead ball.
The Irish won’t beat DePaul/South Florida/Rutgers in the Tuesday opening round Big East Tourney game if Harangody doesn’t receive some help/rest over the next 11 days.
Note: this is NOT a hustle issue for Harangody who, despite shooting 15 of his 25 shots moving away from the basket, secured six offensive boards, four of which eventually led to points. In fact, even after complaining to refs (don’t get me started on the flopping) after two no-calls, it was Harangody who sprinted 90-feet to grab two defensive boards. And it’s Harangody who fights two opponents for every contested rebound. When the Irish have a rare fast break, Harangody invariably is the first man cutting down the middle of the court looking for the ball or rebound.
Notre Dame’s best player needs rest on the bench. At least two short stints in both halves. Otherwise he’s going to continue to “rest” when he needs to post-up on the low block and the Irish late-game offense will continue to sputter.
The Game of the Year
I referred to the January 24,
A win at UConn will turn every NCAA Selection Committee member’s head. That win would be the road pelt the Irish resume needs. A 3-6 conference road mark that includes wins over
Wins vs. DePaul (currently 16th in the Big East), Rutgers (15), South Florida (14), hopefully splitting with
Impressive enough to quell the crowd that would rather see the likes of UNLV,
A full Scouting Report for the UConn game will appear on the homepage Saturday.
I completely agree with your point about the perception of ND being better this year than all of those other years, and therefore everybody is bending over backward to try and get them into the tourney (who says preseason rankings don't mean anything).
I believe part of that is the sort of national intrigue with Harangody. He's kind of a player's player and his blue-collar approach is appreciated and relatable to others. Just some random thoughts, your work is excellent Tim, thanks for the insight.